Megan Hansen reported in yesterday’s Nisqually Valley News:
“The City of Yelm had its hands full when it received a five-page records request from a man who was tased and arrested in late June.
Raymond Leo Jarlik-Bell, 67, of Yelm, was arrested for obstructing a public servant after being pulled over for not having a back license plate…
Jarlik-Bell allegedly refused to get out of his vehicle and was combative with police, resulting in a Yelm officer tasing the man.”
Ed. Note: Mr. Bell’s next Court appearance is Thursday, September 16th, 11AM.
These comments to the online version of this story raise some very interesting points:
“The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of yelmonline.com.”
bisarwisdom wrote on Sep 7, 2010 12:11 PM:
“After reading this article, I’m glad to see people standing up for their rights. If a 67 year old man was obstructing justice, and needed to be tased, then something is wrong with the officer’s decision making ability. I do not support anyone being tasered. I consider it to be attempted murder.
I have reviewed the stress and strain put on the human heart by these taser guns and it needs to stop.
How can we as the community stop these officers?
They do not have a license to kill. Recent news has proved over 500 deaths have occurred from tasers last year.
The geneva convention strictly prohibits the use of electronic warfare or biowarfare on all civilians. ”
Ranger wrote on Sep 8, 2010 1:46 PM:
” The writer says he is part of a “Constitutionalist movement”. I’m not sure if the writer knows that the officers who tazed him swore an Oath to the Constitution.
IF this man is a Constitutionalist, then why are the Officers Tazing him??? And, if these officers are not Constitutionalists which they aren’t, then they should be fired immediately for deprivation of rights.
The constitution was written for this nation by men who put their lives behind their autograph, so that we have the right of free travel without restrictions or licenses. The man in this article was exercising that right. This sounds like these Unconstitutionalist officers prevented him from doing that. I (for one) will not stand for this anymore. All you Officers who swore an Oath to the Constitution, you need to question what you are doing.
Your word is your bond.
And to the writer of this article- you have painted this man to be a criminal. You are probably too young to know the value of the Constitution. I suggest you read it before you write of something you do not know. ”
Det_Daddy wrote on Sep 8, 2010 2:00 PM:
” I believe if Law Enforcement Offcers were respected there wouldn’t be the need for tasers. These individuals have been tied with the political correctness that has swept our country. If someone hits a law enforcement officer, that officer has the right to hit them back and lock them up. But in this day and age of cell phone video that law enforcement officer would get crucified in the media. A sad state of affairs in my book. Respect the Law and you wouldn’t get tased, D A ”
ranger wrote on Sep 8, 2010 4:20 PM:
” “respect the law, and you won’t get tased”???
I’m not even going to discuss how ignorant that statement is.
You sir, have rights whether you choose to exercise them or not. The Constitution is so great that you even have the right to be governed by a corporation outside of the jurisdiction of the Constitution. That is how free you are (under the Constitution).
If you think ‘Law’ is statutes and corporate policies, then you need to go back and learn what Law is.
Good day. ”
THIS IS AN INTERESTING OCCURRENCE IN YELM, ESPECIALLY IN-LIGHT OF THIS NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE STORY BY FAREED ZAKARIA:
“What America Has Lost”
“Its clear we overreacted to 9/11.”
“But the rise of this national-security state has entailed a vast expansion in the governments powers that now touches every aspect of American life, even when seemingly unrelated to terrorism.”
TAZING A 67-YEAR OLD MAN IN YELM, WASHINGTON, USA FOR REFUSING TO GET OUT OF A VEHICLE FOR NOT HAVING A LICENSE PLATE?
OH, AND THE OBSTRUCTING A PUBLIC SERVANT CHARGE?
THE NVN PREVIOUSLY REPORTED THE POLICE OFFICER REACHED IN THE CAR FOR MR. JARIK-BELL’S BRIEFCASE.
HMMM! WHAT HAVE WE BECOME?
Post a comment
One comment
If the Seattle Cops can get away with tazing a pregnant woman not once but 3 times, why would anyone think they wouldn’t taze a 67 year old man at whim? And do you Mr Wisenheimer, “Respect the law and you wouldn’t get tazed” think that any disrespect warrants potential lethal force on a mother and her unborn baby, or an elderly man? Your initials are D.A.? How appropriate. I bet you taze your wife and kids when they talk back.
Let’s apply some clarity here…anyone who thinks you have constutional rights in a courtroom, guess again. The only basis of any so-called constitutional rights YOU have, the civilly dead, not a party to the constitution, 14th amendment citizen, Enemy of the State, (yeah that’s YOU), is enforced against you by your own cocophany of private, implied, adhesion, expressed, and verbal contracts (Driver’s License App, Vehicle Registration, SSN Card, taxes, marriage license, etc., etc., etc.,) that you agreed to with U.S. Inc, State of, County of, City of “For Profit” Corporations,as listed in Dun & Bradstreet; In court, in government, and to the cop who pulls you over, you have no rights!!!
If all you so-called constitutionalist types would do a little research you might get a whole new perspective on government, courts and where your true rights are anchored. If I saw you waving the constitution to a cop, a judge, or in court, with all your nieve rhetoric about your constutionally protected rights, I’d probably taze you for your ignorance myself!
Judges and cops swear an oath to uphold the Const-tution of U.S. INC. and their surety bond not the united states of America.
Statutes and Code are not law until you claim the benefit of using them by private contract and you’re tricked into playing in their great play…it’s ALL COMMERCE…ALL CONTRACT! And you sign your rights away everyday.
We walk into their court (another contract) and start waving the constitution and tell them how they are going to play in their sandbox…Wake-up! It’s their private sandbox, their rules! The judge will grow weary of your charade and threaten you with contempt if you bring it up again.
The Clearfield and Ashwander Doctrines spell it out…a real dilemma for the guy who thinks the constitution will save his bacon in court or instantly create a taser proof vest at the onslot of “I can’t wait to use my taser” wielding “Barney or Bernice Fife”. They are enforcing the private contracts they are hired to enforce. Here’s alittle overview on the Clearfield Doctrine…
Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942)
The ruling and precedent of the above-referenced case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, is herein referred to as the Clearfield Trust Doctrine, and is seminal and foundational in the legal-commercial-monetary system of todays world, and is stare decisis on all courts in the United States and every State of the Union. The Clearfield ruling, in pertinent part, is deemed as consisting of the following principles of law, per the United States Supreme Court decision in Bank of the US v. Planters Bank, (1824), 9 Wheaton (22 U.S.) 904, 6 L Ed 24:
In accord with Clearfield, the United States Supreme Court allegedly also ruled:
When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation. United States v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242.
The United States defined:
United States means (A) a federal [foreign to the states and private domain of real people] corporation: . . . 28 USC 3002(15), Ch. 176. It is clear that the United States . . . is a corporation . . . 534 Federal Supplement 724.
The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a State. 19 Corpus Juris Secundum 884, In re: Merriams Estate, 36 N.Y. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, Affirmed in U.S. v. Perkins, 163 U.S. 625.
The private corporation known as United States, hereinafter US, Inc., is a derivative entity incorporated February 21, 1871, under the name District of Columbia, 16 Stat. 419 Chap. 62 (reorganized June 11, 1878), and pertains to the ten (10) square miles tract ceded by Maryland and Virginia, consisting of Washington, D.C., plus the possessions, territories, forts, docks, and arsenals thereof (tract from Virginia was retroceded in 1846). US, Inc. is neither a nation, nor a country, nor the same as the united states of America, hereinafter USA, the parent corporation established by the constitution of 1787, but is an entity incorporated by Congress while sitting under authority of the 1787 USA Constitution. This US, Inc. incorporation transpired in the operational jurisdiction of the Emergency War Powers, 12 Stat. 319, established in 1861 at the advent of the Civil War and never terminated. The emergency is deemed the operative jurisdiction of the so-called United States Government today, as well as all its courts, agencies, States, subfunctions, law enforcement, and otherwise.
It is essential to understand that a war-powers-emergency jurisdiction establishes a military rule (martial law rule ) in a wartime footing under the law of necessity, which is an operative jurisdiction wherein and whereby law is suspended to deal with the emergency. In the words of the ancient Roman, Cato: In times of war laws are silent. The law of necessity is rule without lawsheer ungrounded and unchecked exercise of deadly violence under color of lawto deal with the self-fabricated and self-defined emergency. Such unchecked rule by monopoly on deadly force is every tyrants dream.
As a private, foreign, commercial, derived corporation, US, Inc. is inherently devoid of authority and lawful capacity to attain paramount authority over the united states of America. In law and reason, legislators may not sit under a derivative authority and use that subservient authority to create an organization that purports to be in opposition to, or attain paramount authority over, the empowering jurisdiction. Doing so, in governmental terms, is treason.
As for the matter of private vs. public, after the bankruptcy of US, Inc. transferred jurisdiction to the private contract and corporate law of the alleged Creditors in bankruptcy, jurisdiction was placed outside the Constitution as per Ashwander and Clearfield cases. This private law of the private foreign creditors is called public policy, pertaining to the insurance policies of underwriting, insuring, and bonding of all corporate activity to enable the bankrupt, civilly dead US, Inc. to operate in commerce. The public has been drawn into the private. A deliberate confusion of terms prevails whereby that which is now called public is in fact private corporate/contract law of a private, foreign, commercial, military law merchant, akin to the Hanseatic League of the 13th to 17th century, which exercised vast world-wide influence in international commerce through its private law merchant. The Hanseatic League had its own courts, taxes and tax-collecting operation, police, and military, as does todays version. There are no operating governments todayonly private for-profit corporations, some of which title themselves governments. Today this private law merchant is wholly fraudulent and illicit based, inter alia, on the nature of the money, and the corresponding laws and systems in support thereof.
The above-referenced non-law jurisdiction of War Powers, no remedy in law exists or can exist, a fact that constitutes a remedy per se based on the principle of law and equity that law must always provide a remedy. All proceedings that are by nature incapable of providing a remedy are inherently and structurally void ab initio. After 1933, based on the bankruptcy of US, Inc., the insolvent US, Inc. acts only under the Clearfield Doctrine as any other private corporate entity controlled in bankruptcy by its owners and/or collectors, and is innately and structurally incapable of satisfying the foundational mandatory provisions of Clearfield.
Based on the foregoing, US, Inc. and it’s subsidiaries [states, counties, cities, and alleged governments thereof] forfeits all claim to sovereignty and, as ruled by Clearfield, takes on the status of a mere private citizen. See: 22 USCA 286(e), et seq.; 26 IRC 165 (g)(1); UCC 1-201(23); CRS 39-22-103.5; Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 am. Dec. 509; Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d 911; Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447, The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; U.S. v. Burr, 309 U.S.242; Sloan Shipyards v. US Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 US 549, 42 S.Ct. 386, 66 L.Ed. 762; US v. Strang, 254 US 49l, 4l S.Ct. l65, 65 L.Ed. 368; Olson v. US Spruce Corp., 267 US 462, 45 S.Ct. 357, 69 L.Ed. 738; FHA v. Burr, 309 US 242, 60 S.Ct. 488, 84 L.Ed. 724; 2l Va. LR 35l; 27 Geo. LJ 1, 34 Yale LJ 1,22; Keifer & Keifer v. US, 306 US 38l, 390, 59 S.Ct. 516, 83 L.Ed. 784; Gardner v. Panama Ref. Inc., 342 US 29, 72 S.Ct. 12, 96 L.Ed. 31; US EFC v. O Shea, 5 F2d 123; Panama RCI v. Minnix, 282 F 47; Panama RCI v. Curran, 256 F 768; Panama RCI v. Bosse, 249 US 41, 39 S.Ct. 211, 63 L.Ed. 466; 70 Harv. LR 829-46; Ashwander v Tennessee Valley Authority (1936), 297 U.S. 288, 80 L Ed 688; and Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942).
Consequently, the body of civilization today is drained of life, spirit, and substance by the inexorable workings of a heartless, soulless, mindless, non-human, anti-human, anti-life, ruthless, out-of-control administration of structured criminality under color of law. Moreover, countless people who operate the system seem to be too lacking in consciousness to be aware of what they are lending their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to perpetuating, as well as not realizing that they are enforcing it on themselves, their families, communities, progeny, country, civilization, and world. The sure and certain consequences of this process, by natural law, is that the winds of time must automatically and necessarily blow the decayed dust of this rapidly disintegrating civilization into oblivion. Mindless and senseless ruin has been the uniform result of every tyrant and tyrannical system in history. From Alexander the Great to Napoleon, despots have died wondering what the point was, seeing that they could take nothing of the fruits of their conquests with them and that all they left behind was a pile of carnage, suffering, chaos, and rubble. With the extent of todays weapons, we may not be so fortunate.
For one brief blink of the eye of cosmic time, a flash of clarity and sanity penetrated the darkness of mans collective blindness. The tribunal of the Nuremberg War Trials following World War II established the precedent in international law that no one is absolved of moral responsibility simply by following orders, or doing my duty. Such avoidance of self-responsibility was the universal defense of those who operated the extermination camps. The self-evident and seminal truth that nothing can absolve man of the exercises of his own free will, however, seems lost on man, hence the state of the world and humanitys mad and mindless marchlike a herd of apathetic and dazed sleepwalking lemmingsto the cliff and into a sea of mass suicide. Sic transit mankind on Earth.
Existentially, no vain imaginings of men can triumph over the eternal laws of being. I have yet to encounter any king, prince, president, judge, court, or otherwise that can suspend the law of gravity by decree, legislation, or judicial ruling, notwithstanding his trappings of office, job, agency, etc. About 2,500 years ago, Lao-tzuarguably one of the greatest sages in the history of mankind on this planetwrote as follows: Those who would take over the earth and shape it to their will, never, I notice, succeed. The earth is like a vessel so sacred, that at the mere approach of the profane it is marredand when they reach out their fingers it is gone.
Unless you keep shocking yourself to develop some magical tolerance to being tased, all you constitution toting, “I know my rights”, “Legal Beagles, should do a little study, research, find the PROOF of any self declared rights before driving without plates, jaywalking, or take a pee in public.
Until then, until you know who you are and what the hell you’re talking about, before making “Declarations of” this and that and Your “Political Unwillingness” to comply to your own contracts, you might want to buy a taser and turn it on yourself next time you want to confront any so-called authorities and pull the trigger before the cops do it for you. Maybe the shock will knock it out of your hands and the duration of the incapaciting shock will be just short of you urinating in your pants and embarrassing yourself once again.
The Government and entire Judicial System is administered and enforced by private contract law and trust law! To realize a remedy you must define the root of the breach of contract and then identify the solution.
A clue in one of the Maxims of Law…”As a thing is bound so it is unbound”
Peacefully and honorably SETTLE the dispute or controversy. Set the example and show others there is another choice…it does work. Evolve!
In Peace
S
The comments are closed.